September 1999
(updated January 2008)

Provided and written by:
Terry Fleck
Deputy Sheriff II / Canine Handler (Retired)

P.O. Box 729
Dayton, NV 89403

(530) 545-2855
e-mail address: k9fleck@aol.com


Index

 

  1. BASIC SEARCH AND SEIZURE RULES

  2. DEFINITIONS

  3. BASIC CANINE CONTRABAND PRINCIPLES

  4. CANINE APPLICATION TO SEARCH AND SEIZURE

  5. CANINE POSITIVE ALERTS

  6. CANINE SNIFF ELEMENTS IN REPORT WRITING

  7. CANINE'S RELIABILITY / TRAINING / CERTIFICATION

  8. SAMPLE CANINE SNIFF SEARCH WARRANT AFFIDAVIT

  9. VEHICLE SNIFFS

  10. BOAT SNIFFS

  11. TRUCK TRACTOR/ TRAILER SNIFFS

  12. BORDER SNIFFS

  13. PEOPLE SNIFFS

  14. SCHOOL SNIFFS

  15. CURRENCY SNIFFS

  16. PARCEL AND MAIL SNIFFS

  17. AIRLINE & AIRPORT SNIFFS

  18. BUS & BUS DEPOT SNIFFS

  19. STORAGE UNIT SNIFFS

  20. RESIDENTIAL SNIFFS

  21. TRAIN & TRAIN DEPOT SNIFFS

  22. JAIL/PRISON SNIFFS

  23. AIRPLANE SNIFFS

  24. MOTEL SNIFFS

  25. LINGERING and DIFFERENT ODOR ALERTS

  26. OTHER ALERTS

 

CASE INDEX:

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT:

(Decisions affecting all fifty states)

Bond v United States

Carroll v United States

Chimel v California

City of Indianapolis v Edmond

Florida v Bostick

Florida v Rabb

Florida v Royer

Horton v California

Illinois v Caballes

Illinois v Gates

Illinois v Lidster

Maryland v Buie

Maryland v Pringle

Maryland v Wilson

New Jersey v T.L.O.

Ohio v Robinette

Payton v New York

Rawlings v Kentucky

Samson v California

Smith v Texas

Terry v State of Ohio

Texas v Brown

Thornton v United States

United States v Arvizu

United States v Drayton

United States v Jacobsen

United States v Knights

United States v Montoya de Hernandez

United States v Place

United States v Ross

United States v Sokolow

Whren v United States

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS:

FIRST CIRCUIT:

(Decisions affecting Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Puerto Rico and

Rhode Island)

United States v Allen

United States v Brown

United States v De Los Santos Ferrer

United States v Esquilin

United States v Jodoin

United States v LaFrance

United States v Lawlor

United States v Lopez

United States v Maldonado-Espinosa

United States v Meyer

United States v Nunez

United States v Owens

United States v Quinn

United States v Race

United States v Rodriguez-Morales

United States v Rosario-Peralta

United States v Saccoccia

United States v West

United States v $36,634 U.S. Currency

 

SECOND CIRCUIT:

(Decisions affecting Connecticut, New York and Vermont)

United States v Bronstein

United States v Glover

United States v Hooper

United States v Johnson

United States v Mendez

United States v Waltzer

 

THIRD CIRCUIT:

(Decisions affecting Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Virgin Islands)

United States v Burton

United States v Carr

United States v Frost

United States v Hartwell

United States v Massac

United States v Thame

United States v Yamba

United States v $10,700 U.S. Currency

 

FOURTH CIRCUIT:

(Decisions affecting Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina,
Virginia and West Virginia)

United States v Alpert

United States v Carter

United States v Eura

United States v Jeffus

United States v McFarley

United States v Mondragon

United States v Robinson

United States v Singh

United States v Sullivan

United States v Torres

United States v Whitehead

 

FIFTH CIRCUIT:

(Decisions affecting Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas)

Horton v Goose Creek Independent School District

Jennings v Joshua Independent School District

Resendiz v Miller

United States v Ayala

United States v Butler

United States v Cagle

United States v Castro

United States v Cuellar

United States v Daniel

United States v Dortch

United States v Dovali-Avila

United States v Duffaut

United States v Garcia-Garcia

United States v Goldstein

United States v Gonzalez-Basulto

United States v Gutierrez

United States v Hernandez

United States v Ibarra

United States v Jackson

United States v Kelly

United States v Lovell

United States v Machuca-Barrera

United States v Moore

United States v Moreno-Vargas

United States v Outlaw

United States v Resio-Trejo

United States v Reyes

United States v Rivas

United States v Sanchez-Pena

United States v Sawyer

United States v Seals

United States v Tarazon-Silva

United States v Viera

United States v Williams

United States v Williams

United States v Zucco

 

SIXTH CIRCUIT:

(Decisions affecting Kentucky, Ohio, Michigan and Tennessee)

United States v Avery

United States v Baro

United States v Berry

United States v Boxley

United States v Buchanon

United States v Carter

United States v Davis

United States v Diaz

United States v Gant

United States v Garcia

United States v Guzman

United States v Hill

United States v Huguenin

United States v Knox

United States v Lambert

United States v Lewis

United States v Navarro-Camacho

United States v Orsolini

United States v Perez

United States v Reed

United States v Robinson

United States v Saperstein

United States v $5,000 in U.S. Currency

United States v $53,082 U.S. Currency

United States v $67,220 U.S. Currency

 

SEVENTH CIRCUIT:

(Decisions affecting Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin)

Doe v Renfrow

Moya v United States

United States v Borys

United States v Brock

United States v Carpenter

United States v Dennis

United States v Desoto

United States v Edwards

United States v Ferguson

United States v Fiala

United States v Finke

United States v French

United States v Ganser

United States v Goodwin

United States v Johnson

United States v Jones

United States v Kaniff

United States v Klein

United States v Limares

United States v Lozano

United States v Martin

United States v McCarthur

United States v Moralez

United States v Rogers

United States v Rivera

United States v Patterson

United States v Sterling

United States v Sullivan

United States v Teslim

United State v Thomas

United States v Vasquez

United States v Ward

United States v Withers

United States v $30,670 in U.S. Currency

United States v $506,231 in U.S. Currency

 

EIGHTH CIRCUIT:

(Decisions affecting Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska,

North Dakota and South Dakota)

Conrod v Davis

United States v Adams

United States v Alexander

United States v Beck

United States v Blaylock

United States v Bloomfield

United States v Brown

United States v Carpenter

United States v Carrazco

United States v Delaney

United States v DeMoss

United States v Donnelly

United States v Escobar

United States v Ferrer-Montoya

United States v Foley

United States v Friend

United States v Fuller

United States v Gomez

United States v Graham

United States v Gray

United States v Green

United States v Gregory

United States v Gwinn

United States v Harvey

United States v Hill

United States v Jacobs

United States v Lakoskey

United States v Large

United States v Lebrun

United States v Linkous

United States v Logan

United States v Longbehn

United States v Lyons

United States v Lyons

United States v Maejia

United States v Mahler

United States v Maltais

United States v Martin

United States v Martinez

United States v Martinez

United States v Morgan

United States v Morenes

United States v Muhammed

United States v Munroe

United States v Olivera-Mendez

United States v O'Neal

United States v Palacious-Suarez

United States v Pantazis

United States v Pratt

United States v Riley

United States v Robinson

United States v Roby

United States v Sanchez

United States v Smith

United States v Sundby

United States v Tugwell

United States v Va Lerie

United States v Valle Cruz

United States v Vasquez

United States v Walker

United States v White

United States v White

United States v Williams

United States v Williams

United States v Yang

United States v Zacher

United States v $39,873 U.S. Currency

United States v $84,615 U.S. Currency

United States v $91,960 U.S. Currency

United States v $117,920 U.S. Currency

United States v $124,700 U.S. Currency

United States v $141,770 U.S. Currency

United States v $404,905 in U.S. Currency

 

NINTH CIRCUIT:

(Decisions affecting Alaska, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho,

Montana, Northern Mariana Islands, Nevada, Oregon, Pacific Islands and

Washington)

B.C. v Plumas Unified School District

United States v Aldaz

United States v Attardi

United States v Ayarza

United States v Beale

United States v Bowhay

United States v Brown

United States v Cedano-Arellano

United States v Dicesare

United States v Dickerson

United States v England

United States v Erwin

United States v Fernandez

United States v Garcia

United States v Garza

United States v Gill

United States v Golb

United States v Guerrera

United States v Hamilton

United States v Hatley

United States v Hernandez

United States v Ibarra

United States v Jackson

United States v Jamal Williams

United States v Jensen

United States v Johnson

United States v Lingenfelter

United States v Low

United States v Manjarrez

United States v Martell

United States v Mendez

United States v Mondello

United States v Perez

United States v Quoc Viet Hoang

United States v Ramirez

United States v Richards

United States v Solis

United States v Spetz

United States v Stephens

United States v Taylor

United States v Todhunter

United States v $22,474 U.S. Currency

United States v $30,060 U.S. Currency

United States v $42,500 U.S. Currency

United States v $49,576 U.S. Currency

United States v $191,910 U.S. Currency

United States v $215,300 U.S. Currency

 

TENTH CIRCUIT:

(Decisions affecting Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Utah and

Wyoming)

Romo v Champion

United States v Anchondo

United States v Barbee

United States v Bell

United States v Blaze

United States v Bloom

United States v Brown

United States v Burns

United States v Carhee

United States v Cavely

United States v Cervine

United States v Chavira

United States v Engles

United States v Garcia

United States v Garzon

United States v Gault

United States v Glover

United States v Gonzalez-Acosta

United States v Hall

United States v Houston

United States v Hunnicutt

United States v Kennedy

United States v Klinginsmith

United States v Ladeaux

United States v Ludwig

United States v MacDonald

United States v Massie

United States v McCranie

United States v Mendoza

United States v Mercado

United States v Moore

United States v Morales-Zamora

United States v Nicholson

United States v Ojeda-Ramos

United States v Ortega-Jimenez

United States v Patten

United States v Ramirez

United States v Rosborough

United States v Scales

United States v Scarborough

United States v Souza

United States v Stewart

United States v Stone

United States v Sukiz-Grado

United States v Valles

United States v Venema

United States v Villa-Chaparro

United States v Ward

United States v Williams

United States v Williams

United States v Williams

United States v Williams

United States v Winningham

United States v Wood

United States v Wynne

United States v $252, 300 U.S. Currency

Zamora v Pomeroy

 

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT:

(Decisions affecting Alabama, Florida and Georgia)

Hearn v Board of Public Education

Merrett v Moore

United States v Banks

United States v Banshee

United States v Cooper

United States v Dunkley

United States v Glinton

United States v Goddard

United States v Guapi

United States v Hardy

United States v Holloman

United States v Miravalles

United States v Prevo

United States v Puglisi

United States v Sentovich

United States v Smith

United States v Tamari

United States v Virden

United States v Watts

United States v $242,484 U.S. Currency

 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT:

(Decisions affecting District of Columbia, Washington)

United States v Battista

United States v Carrasquillo

United States v Carter

United States v Colyer

United States v Fulero

United States v Nurse

United States v Tartaglia

United States v Trayer

United States v $639,558 U.S. Currency



Return to Top

Return to the Home Page


Created and maintained by Terry Fleck. Contact: k9fleck@aol.com
Copyright © 1999 - 2008 Terry Fleck. All rights reserved.

Webmaster